The use of Restraints

The photomodel has given her rights on her own...
Image via Wikipedia

Often in the latter stages of a person’s life, it may seem necessary to protect them from themselves. This can include the use of various physical and chemical restraints, in order to keep the person from moving in such a way as to injure themselves or someone else. Of course, in other times, it can just be convenient for one person to restrain another person. In those kinds of circumstances, the less kindly and giving aspects of human nature need to be restrained, as opposed to restraining people who are inconvenient to care for. Far too often, a person who has been tasked with taking care of an elderly individual just decides that it would be so much easier to just restrain them, than it would be to do something more respectful and useful. Restraints of any kind should never be used unless not doing so would create a clear and present danger to the geriatric individual.

One popular type of restraint is the most obvious kind – basically tying up the person to be restrained. Using a rope, a belt, or some kind of tape, the abuser ties the geriatric individual to a fixed object such as a bed, or simply ties them up, as disturbing as it sounds, like a mummy’s wrappings. This is more than just cruel and inhumane; it is also illegal in the extreme. Simply tying up a person is somewhere on the order of criminal confinement, and is at the very least a cruel practice. But another way to restrain a person is just as cruel, if more insidious in its application.

That method of restraining a person is via chemical means. In essence, chemically restraining a person involves rendering them unconscious via some kind of drug. While this is a practice that is far from kind or humane, it is practiced far more often than it should be. In some limited occasions, it may be a reasonable way to keep a geriatric individual from causing him or herself harm. But in most circumstances, it is nothing more than abuse. The law forbids such things.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Living Will: not Optional

A "refusal of treatment" form from o...
Image via Wikipedia

In this day and age, nearly everybody knows that it is important to have a will. After all, your will is a pretty literal document. It is a little piece of paper that explains, in so many words, what your will is for the disbursal of what you own after your death. It also has a great deal of influence as far as the care of any dependents you may have. If you have adult children with disabilities for whom you have been caring, your will is a critical document for detailing their care, as well. But believe it or not, there are a lot of people who have no idea that your living will is just as important as your standard will. While these two documents can be one and the same, far too many people assume that they will simply die some day. In many cases, the situation is far more complicated than that.

If you are ever stricken with an illness that does not immediately take your life, you will need to have a living will in place for several reasons. For one, it will detail how you want your finances to be handled in your (perhaps temporary) absence. For another, it will talk about how much work you want to have done in resuscitating you if you should fall into a coma or become otherwise seriously incapacitated. While we all hope that situations of this nature will not befall us, not being prepared for such a situation will do nothing to stop its possibility.

If you do not currently have a living portion to your will, now is the best time to make an appointment with your attorney and get this knocked out. You will never have a better time than the present to take care of an issue of this nature. As sad and fatalistic as it is, every day that you spend thinking that this will never happen to you is a day in which it very well might. And while you can ignore the problem, a living will is your best real defense.

Enhanced by Zemanta